James Argument on the Belief in God in The Will to Believe and Essay

pile Argument on the Belief in matinee idol in The Will to Believe and Pascals Wager - Essay ExampleTherefore, Pascal concludes that any coherent being has a duty to suppose in theology to attain the infinite happiness. However, this argument by Wager raises many amateurs from philosophers who view the argument as lacking probability in the life story of globe and more so related to belief. Pascals argument is viewed as an extraordinary power. The prop cardinalnts of this argument formulate that even though Wagers argument cleverness be taken as fictional and a probability taken on this argument, on at the end we might be reproach and the argument might be true after all. Therefore, no matter how small the probability, Pascals argument should be accepted as true according to this argument. However, William James is a serious critic of this argument by Pascal and tries to discredit the hypothesis and the conclusion by Pascal regarding accept in God. For James, belief invol ves a will to choose among possible excerptions and such an option has to begin concrete endorse and our faith in most cases is responsible for shaping future outcomes. Rather than taking forced options that might end up being false, James stresses on being indifferent. The assertion by James is thus more skeptical one that does non offer concrete proofs as compared to Pascals. ... Interestingly James postulates that wherever there is an option where losing the truth away and save ourselves at any rate of believing falsehood by non making up our minds till objective evidence has come, such an option would be worthwhile compared to believing the falsehoods in such circumstances (James, 5). This contradicts Pascals argument that it is the nature and obligation of any credible humanity to believe in God, since whether or not God exists would have a greater degree of happiness for such an individual. Consider the postulation below by Pascal. God exists God does not exist Believe in God infinity f1 Do not believe in God f2 f3 Therefore, according to the above table, if God exists and you believe, such an individual has an infinitely happy life to gain. On the other hand if God doe not exist or you do not believe then your utility level in such cases as indicated by f1, f2, f3 is finite (Tabarrok, 123). Therefore, one who believes in God according to Pascal has more to gain in both cases as compared to those who do not believe in God. Taking James postulation, the second case would apply where if truly God exists the individual would have to lose everything as the chance of gaining the truth is thrown away in apprehension of believing in falsehoods (James, 5). It would follow that Pascals postulation is more concrete and accurate compared to the postulation by James on the subject of believing in God. The critics of James to Pascals change by reversal can also be applied to criticize his own work. James explains that humans are recorders and not the makers of truth. In addition James explains that facts are facts and independent of our believing or not (James,